Backupsets vs. Archives
The backupset is often considered a replacement for doing archives, but both has both positive and negative features:
| Positive | Negative | |
| Backupsets |
»Generated on the server, does not put a load on client and LAN. »Can be restored locally on the node if a common media is used. »No time dependency, all the week can be utilized to generate the backupsets. » Writing is directly to tape, no frontend diskpool is necessary. »Practically no impact on database size. |
» Each backupset occupies at least one full volume. » Generating backupsets can be a very slow process. » Single file restore can only be done using the command line client and you must know the filename beforehand. » No support for backupsets in TSM's scheduling mechanism. » No central overview over which generations ran OK and which did not. |
| Archives |
»Single file restore is easy because you can see the filetree displayed graphically. » Full support for archives in TSM's scheduling mechanism. |
»Puts a load on both clients and LAN. »Big installations will often not be able to finish the complete archiving within the timespan of a weekend »Many archiving schedules will report 'Failed' due to locked files even though they ran OK. »Generating many archives simultanously requires a diskpool as frontend to the tapepool. »Can make your database grow a lot ! |
